Sunday, August 7, 2016

Focusing on the women in post-World War I

I can tell that every single installment in this series 
is going to be yet another absolutely superb book. 
That makes me very happy! :)

Mary has just completed a months-long research project 
with which she is very satisfied; 
her "first effort as a mature scholar." And...
I had survived the compulsory Christmas revels, a féte which 
had reached fever pitch in this, the last year 
of my aunt's control of what she saw as the family purse. 
The anticipation was for the week of freedom before me, 
one entire week with neither commitments nor responsibilities, leading up to my twenty-first birthday and 
all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. 
A small but persistent niggle of trepidation 
                                                 tried to make itself known, 
                            but I forestalled it by standing up and going to the chest of drawers for clothing. (3)
Ah, well, I just assume that "trepidation" must somehow involve Sherlock, amIright?!?
I did not have to think about my choice of goals--I should begin at the cottage of my friend and mentor, my tutor, sparring partner, and comrade-in-arms, Sherlock Holmes. 
Hence my anticipation. Hence also the trepidation. (4)
Yes, I was correct! :) True to form, Mary dresses in "the most moth-eaten of her long-dead father's suits," gathers whatever money she has squirreled away over the years, 
put on my boots and the dingy overcoat I kept at the back of the cupboard beneath the stairs, 
and escaped from the overheated, overcrowded, emotion-laden house 
into the clear, cold sea air of the Sussex Downs. My breath smoked around me and 
my feet crunched across patches not yet thawed by the watery sunlight, 
and by the time I reached Holmes' cottage five miles away, 
I felt clean and calm for the first time since leaving Oxford at the end of the term. (5)   
I adore King's writing! I mean, I feel as if I'm doing the walking! She puts ME right there! I am Mary! Once Mary reaches Sherlock's house she learns from Mrs. Hudson that he has gone "to Town." 

Mary travels to London to find Holmes, whom she knew would be driving a hack (as determined from the clothes he had worn), and succeeded! However, their conversation ended with her literally doing a back-flip to get off the hack, and tossing items at the horse until it bolted, while she ran in the opposite direction, with Holmes failing to locate her in the aftermath. What made her so angry? His insistence that she had hunted him down to ask him a question. And that question was...?
"Come now, Russell, you are a great proponent of the emancipation of women; 
surely you can manage to carry out your intentions in this little matter."
"Little?" I seized on the word, as he knew I would. "First you place the proposition in my mouth,          and then you denigrate it. I don't know why I even--" I bit back the words.
"Why you thought of it in the first place, is that what you were about to say?"
..."So, why did you think of it?" he pressed, his voice calm but with a finely honed edge to it. "Have I given you any reason to believe that I might welcome such a suggestion?
I am fifty-nine years old, Russell, and I have long been accustomed to the privacy and freedom 
of the bachelor life. Do you imagine that I might succumb to the dictates of social norms 
and marry you in order to stop tongues from wagging when we go off together? 
Or perhaps you imagine that the pleasures of the wedding bed might prove irresistible?" (13)
Ha! That Holmes. He is definitely irresistible to consider as a lifelong partner, isn't he? ;)

Later that night, Mary is spotted by Lady Veronica Beaconsfield, "a lodgings mate in Oxford," that ultimately brings Russell and Holmes "a case" to investigate. Though first, Mary sleeps the rest of the day at Ronnie's lodging and they speak later:
Revelations that come easily at night are harder by the light of day. (26)
Ah, that is so true, is it not? What we're willing to divulge late at night can differ greatly come the following morning. :) But Ronnie divulges "an all-too-common story in those postwar years." 
There was a man; rather, there had been a man... A friend in 1914, he joined the New Army in 1915, was sent virtually untrained to the Western Front, and promptly walked into a bullet; sent home for eight weeks' recovery, their friendship deepened: He returned to the trenches, numerous letters followed, and then he was gassed in 1917 and again sent home: an engagement ring followed: he returned yet again to the Front, was finally demobbed in January 1919, a physically ruined, mentally frail mockery of his former self, liable to black, vicious moods and violent tempers alternating with periods of either manic gaiety or bleak inertia, when all he could do 
was silently smoke one cigarette after another, seeming completely unaware of other people. 
It was called shell shock, the nearly inevitable aftermath of month after month in hell, 
and every man who had been in the trenches had it to some degree...
Veronica no longer wore the ring. (26-27) 
What struck me about this is that first, it is quite an accurate description of what we now term PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and secondly, I had never really considered, before reading this series as well as the Maisie Dobbs series by Jacqueline Winspear, that such disabilities in the aftermath of warfare truly began after World War I. At least this was (as far as I know) the first time such a vast number of people had been involved in "modern warfare" across the globe. I know it was the first war in which truly advanced technology allowed the killing and wounding of such vast numbers. And then, having read Robin Oliveira's My Name is Mary Sutter, I realize the ineptitude of "medical professionals" (I use that term rather loosely, given the fact that little to no education was required.) to deal with even the most basic of physical injuries, let alone any emotional damage. Remember, this was prior to knowledge there were such things as "germs" and "bacteria" that could cause infection, hence, most of the men treated for physical wounds died of the resultant, seemingly inevitable, infections. I particularly appreciated King's emphasis on physiological dependency versus emotional dependency with regard to addiction. She demonstrated much insight. 

Since then, Ronnie has involved herself in a religious organizaton, The New Temple in God, through which much good is done for those who are 'less fortunate' than herself. Upon experiencing a 'service' performed by the head of this religious organization, Margery Childe, Ronnie asks if Mary would like to "go back and say hello" to this woman. 
I would like. I was fascinated, impressed, more than a bit repelled, and altogether extremely curious. The woman had played her audience like a finely tuned instrument, 
handling nearly four hundred people with the ease of a seasoned politician. 
Even I, non-Christian and hardened cynic that I am, has found it difficult to resist her. 
She was a feminist and she had a sense of humour, an appealing combination that was regrettably rare, and she came across as a person who was deeply, seriously committed to her beliefs, 
yet who retained the distance and humanity to laugh at herself. 
She was articulate without being pompous, and apparently self-educated since the age of fifteen. Her attitude towards the Bible seemed to be refreshingly matter-of-fact, and her theology, 
miracle of miracles, was from what I had heard radical but sound. 
Oh, yes, I should like to meet this woman. (37)
Remember, Mary was a theology major, so she knows a thing or two about this. As you might imagine, there is much more 'behind the scenes' than Mary initially knew or noticed. And, I was anxious to see how Laurie King, who is educated in theology herself, played out this theme. Though I, myself, am much like Mary in my own beliefs, I enjoy intellectual discussions and musings about religion, if the arguments are based on some sort of rational thought or logic, rather than strictly emotional "blind faith." (However, I do take it a bit further in that I am an atheist, believing in no deity whatsoever. I feel as if Mary may feel the same...) 

Mary observes that each person in this seemingly 'elite' circle of congregants takes a rose from a huge vase at the entrance to the back room and lays it at Margery's feet as they enter the room. As Mary enters she notes,
She was calm and sure and filled with power beyond her years and, I had to admit, 
enormously compelling. The room waited for me to lay my rose at her feet and 
do my obeisance so it could get on with its courtly rituals.
Without taking my eyes from hers, I raised the flower with great deliberation and 
threaded it into a buttonhole, then stepped forward and extended my hand to her.
"How do you do?" I said, and smiled with noncommittal politeness. (39)
Ah, yes, that's our Mary Russell--always willing to push the envelope just a bit, isn't she? Rebellious to the end. That is just one of the many traits I love about this character! This initial meeting ends with Margery stating:
"Perhaps you might stay on a bit after my friends have left? I should like a word." (40)
As answer/assent Mary "inclined her head silently" and sat in a corner of the room.
The next hour would have been excruciatingly boring had it not been 
for the undercurrents and interplay that I found absolutely fascinating. 
She played this room with the same ease that she had played the hall, 
though to very different purpose. Before, her aim had been exhortation, inspiration, 
perhaps a bit of thought provocation. Here, she was acting as spiritual counsellor, 
mother confessor, and guiding light to this, her inner circle, drawing them out and 
drawing them together into a cohesive whole around herself. 
Fourteen women (excluding myself), all of them young (the oldest was thirty-four or thirty-five), all reasonably attractive, all obviously wealthy, intelligent, and well-bred, and all of them 
with that ineffable but unmistakable air of women who had not sat still during the war. (40)
These women had all supported the war effort to the best of their physical ability, most of them risking their own lives at or near the front in supporting roles. Such an eye-opening look at the world after World War I and it's devastation. 

Mary stays and speaks with Margery, eventually agreeing to help her, realizing that this woman's 
humility had trapped me as her authority could not, and her expressions of gratitude at my offer had an edge of triumph. Reluctantly, disarmed, I gave her my wry smile, and she laughed. (56)
She was friendly and relaxed and self-deprecating, but I could not feel entirely at ease with her. Precisely what it was about her that I found unsettling, I could not pin down. 
Partly, it was the childlike size of her, which made me tower awkwardly...Partly, it was the way she walked so very close, her shoulder occasionally brushing my sleeve, so that I breathed in 
her not-unattractive aroma of sweat and hot silk and some subtle and musky perfume.
Partly, it was the awareness of how easily she had found a weakness in my ready defences and made me agree to help her. Mostly, though, it was an intangible, a low, pulsing wave of fascination and discomfiture that continued, even now, to radiate from her like some fabulous tropical flower whose heavenly fragrance mesmerises the insects on which it feeds. 
It was with relief that I wished her a good night. However, the relief was tempered by a certain wistful regret, and by the awareness that I had not entirely escaped the trap after all. (57)
By this point I was really wondering...is this a group of lesbians? Is this her attempt to recruit women as lesbians? It just seemed to me there must be some insidious underlying intent...

Margery's sermon on love:
..."the flow of love, like the flow of a stream, suffers from being blocked up and kept to one's self. Water damned up becomes stale, dank. Love not given out becomes dead and slimy.
When we express our love, when we act as conduits for divine love, 
then the love within us is continually renewed, refreshed, restored. (110)
Though I don't believe the ability to love comes from any deity, I do agree with this statement. Mary decides
Despite her unread, unsophisticated, raw, rude, and unlettered approach to Scripture, 
when it came to zeroing in on her target, she was dead-centre accurate...
It hit me about halfway through her talk...what...I was hearing...was a mystic.
What I was hearing was an untutored woman singing to God int eh only voice she possessed:
a simple voice, unsuited to high opera, but not without beauty. (111)

Mary coerces Holmes to help Veronica's former fiancé with his addiction. (There is a reference to Holmes' own son and his struggle with addiction, which has me curious.) Mary continues work on her next academic paper which deals with the essential question: "Can a feminist be a Jew, or a Jew a feminist?" We learn she is to give a joint presentation with another colleague on January 28th. Little does Mary know that through her continued interest in The New Temple in God and interaction with Margery Childe, she will be 'indisposed' on January 28th...

King begins each chapter with a pertinent quote from various older texts, adding to the reader's understanding, and my vehemence! The majority iterate the beliefs of women being submissive, subject to men's authority, etc. :) Though I did particularly enjoy this one:
A woman's guess is much more accurate than a man's certainty.
                                                                                              --Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936)
Agreed! :) Women are dying. These deaths are discounted as "accidents" or less, but Mary grows particularly suspicious and formally involved in the investigation following her good friend, Veronica's, narrow escape from death. The only commonality she can discover is Margery Childe. Mary's own "guesswork"
"...begins with the war and the perfectly appalling numbers of young men who were killed and crippled during those four years. At the beginning of the War, there were around six million men in this country of a marrying age, between twenty and forty. By the end of 1918, nearly a million of them lay dead. Another two million were wounded, half of them so badly damaged, mentally or physically, that they may never recover. Where does this leave some two to three million healthy young women who would ordinarily have married healthy young men and spent the rest of their lives caring for babies and husbands? The papers refer to them--us!--as 'surplus women,' 
as if our poor planning left us here while the men were removed. 
The women who ran this country, and ran it well, from 1915 to 1919, 
have now been pushed from their jobs to make way for the returning soldiers. 
Strong, capable women are now made to feel redundant in both the workplace and the home, 
and no...this is not just suffragette ranting..." (209)

This one got a bit dark as Mary was held captive and Holmes was gone...but...although it did turn out that Margery's connections were not the best, she herself, was not implicated in any of the crimes.

What of Holmes and Russell?
Let's just say that 38 year age difference doesn't matter...when you're 'in love'!
Though there were negotiations, finalized by a firm handshake!

I love this series!
I hope you're able to read something you love just as much!
Happy reading
            --Lynn

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Social Justice Book Club Read #3

 Kerry of Entomology of a Bookworm is hosting the Social Justice Book Club
This is especially pertinent for me since I have pledged to increase 
my Nonfiction reading this year, and to include more titles 
that are not purely biographical/autobiographical.
#SJBookClub
The first two books have been A-M-A-Z-I-N-G!!!

Read #1--Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson
(I have not yet been able to distill my thoughts into a blog posting.)

The work this man does--absolutely amazing!

My first thought upon finishing it? 
"I could move to Alabama and 
work for the Equal Justice Initiative!"
And really, I should! 
What could be more fulfilling?!?


by Laura Tillman

This book is particularly near and dear to my soul. 

Tillman depicts the myriad of disabling characteristics 
that can affect any one of us:
sociological, psychological, emotional, intellectual.

The one takeaway she hopes each reader has?

Crimes derive from and happen to all of us.

Such a deceptively simple sentence, but so full of meaning.

by Michelle Alexander

This book promises to present many facts and statistics
to prove beyond a doubt the 'unfairness' and 'injustice' 
inherent in the U.S. justice system.

I have always said...there is as much 'justice' 
available to you in the U.S. as you can afford!
If you don't believe money is the main determinant 
of who is incarcerated and who is not, 
you don't have much experience with it.
Sad...but oh, so very true. 

Kerry has prepared a short list of questions to serve as an introduction to this third read.
Additionally, she has prepared a reading schedule. 
All this information is here. You can also register to participate while there!

Question #1: Where do you plan on discussing this book the most? 
                       (Use #SJBookClub)
                      
                     Here on the blog, of course. 
                     Goodreads: I typically post updates as I read.
                     Twitter: @BooknMusicLvr 

Question #2: Why did you decide to join in the reading and/or discussion 
                       of this book? 

                       Because I love to learn more about issues that matter to me, and injustice 
                       matters to me...a lot! There is my commitment to read more Nonfiction this
                       year to consider. It is always more fun and much more enlightening to                                        discuss what I read with others. This couldn't be more timely, given the 
                       seemingly recent spate of violent arrests and killings by police that have 
                       hit the news. Though I'm aware for every one we see, there are many 
                       many more that occur, which is even scarier!

Question #3: In the very first line of the introduction to the book, Michelle Alexander 
                     writes, "This book is not for everyone." What do you make of that as an 
                     entree into The New Jim Crow?

                     I believe she is trying to provide further information and ammunition to those 
                     who have at least realized the injustices that have been and continue to be 
                     perpetrated upon certain 'minority' segments of the U.S. population. I hope her                          purpose is to further empower myself and other readers to advocate for 
                     change.

Question #4: What, if anything, are you most looking forward to about this book?

                       I want to know more! I want more facts and figures to throw at people who are                          still clueless or just don't care about the fact that U.S. social systems are 
                       structured to disenfranchise and incarcerate those who have historically been                            discriminated against! More evidence that these same practices have 
                       simply been incorporated into the justice system to accomplish the same 
                       goal(s) of suppression and subjugation. I realize this will make me angry, but 
                       dammit, I SHOULD be angry! As a member of the 'majority' I need to 
                       advocate for 'minorities.' There should be fair and equal treatment for all. That                            is the concept upon which the U.S. is supposedly founded! 
                       (Okay, maybe I'm already angry...but that's okay...)

Have you read this book?
Or any others you feel are similar?
What are your reactions?
If you are curious at all, or just want to discuss these issues, please join us!

Happy Reading, Y'all!   

Pickwick Papers Read-Along Check-In #5: July 2016

 Though I dutifully (and enjoyably, as always) read chapters 12-14 last week,
I am just now getting to my posting for them! 
Don't forget that this Read-Along is hosted by Behold the Stars!
I adore the fact that we are rereading this work in the exact way it was published 
(2-3 chapters per month) 180 years ago! Cool!
You can read all previous posts and further information about this event here.
You can also check out O's review here.
Her review provides me with much more understanding of Dickens' referents, etc.
And with no further ado...we proceed!

The Pickwickians (sans Mr. Tupman who remained back at Manor Farm) rescued
Miss Rachael from the hands of 'Jingle' and all returned to Manor Farm, 
only to find that Mr. Tupman had left, though he was thoughtful enough 
to leave a quite melodramatic note, listing his new location. :)
(These guys are all too funny!)
The four adventurers are soon reunited!

We find Mr. Pickwick pacing "to and fro with hurried steps" in "his rooms" as he obviously awaits someone's arrival, "popp[ing] his head out of the window at intervals of about three minutes each" and "constantly referr[ing] to his watch." We learn he has sent "the boy" on an errand and anxiously awaits his return. As he speaks with his landlady, Mrs. Bardell, she vastly misinterprets his determination, impatient attitude, and intent as he asks,
'Do you think it a much greater expense to keep two people than to keep one?' 
'That depends...upon the person, you know, Mr. Pickwick; 
and whether it's a saving and careful person, sir.'
'That's very true...but the person I have in my eye (here he looked very hard at Mrs. Bardell) I think possesses these qualities; and has, moreover, a considerable knowledge of the world, and a great deal of sharpness, Mrs. Bardell; which may be of material use to me.' (151)
As Pickwick continues to talk about her own son now having a companion and she herself having some company, she believes that this man whom she has 
"long worshipped...at a distance" is finally 
proposing marriage! In the aftermath of her excitement and Mr. Pickwick's confusion and befuddlement, she 
faints right into the man's arms! This, just as 
'Master Bardell' (the son/boy) enters the room, 
ushering in Mr. Tupman, Mr. Winkle, and 
Mr. Snodgrass. Immediately perceiving his mother as 
victim of an attack, 'Master Bardell' commences to 
kick Mr. Pickwick with all his might!

They finally manage to control the boy and lead Mrs. Bardell down the stairs, as Pickwick muses...
'I cannot conceive what has been the matter with that woman. I merely announced to her my intention of keeping a man-servant, when she fell into the extraordinary paroxysm in which you found her. Very extraordinary thing.'
'Very,' said his three friends.
'Placed me in such an extremely awkward situation,' continued Mr. Pickwick.
'Very,' was the reply of his followers, as they coughed slightly, and looked dubiously at each other.
Their behaviour was not lost upon Mr. Pickwick. He remarked their incredulity.
They evidently suspected him. (153-154)
It is then that a man has appears "in the passage," and it is none other than Mr. Samuel Weller, whom they had met at the White Hart Inn where Jingle had taken Miss Rachael. And this man accepts the position as Mr. Pickwick's man-servant immediately. I am thinking to myself that he may have bitten off a bit more than he can chew, since it's rather obvious he will be serving all four of these men when they travel, not just Pickwick. But he seems happy with the arrangement! For now, anyway! :) The next morning, he comments,
'I wonder whether I'm meant to be a footman, or a groom, 
or a gamekeeper, or a seedsman.
I looks like a sort of compo of every one of 'em. 
Never mind; there's change of air, plenty to see, 
                                                                      and little to do; and all this suits my complaint uncommon; 
                                                                so long life to the Pickwicks, says I!' (156)

Their next adventure takes these four Pickwickians to the Borough of Eatanswill for the local Parliamentary elections. (Now, immediately upon seeing this name, I am thinking "Eat and Swill," since that it how it sounds when you say it aloud. And we are given this long-winded explanation that those who were writing this using the original Pickwickian papers, were unable to ever locate any evidence of this Borough's existence! lol) So, this sounds much like the U.S. political scene today: there were two parties, the 'Blues' and the 'Buffs,' and virtually "everything in Eatanswill was made a party question." In other words, there were always divisions about any and all issues, strictly along party lines. (Yep! Definitely sounds familiar, doesn't it?) Upon their arrival, these four are rather confused as to which party they should show loyalty. At one point the crowd sets up a roar "like that of a whole menagerie when the elephant has rung the bell for cold meat." :)

Pickwick declares allegiance to the 'Blues,' same as his friend Mr. Perker, and they are given lodgings, though in two different locations, due to limited availability of beds at the inn. They learn that one party has sequestered (perhaps held captive would be a more accurate description) 33 voters in the coach-house and one party has bribed the women 45 women with new green parasols, and each of them has supposedly "secured all [the votes of] their husbands, and half their brothers" for the respective party as a consequence of gifting such "finery." Some of them have a plot afoot to actually drug some of the men by adding laudanum to their drinks, leaving them unconscious and thereby unable to vote until 12 hours after the election! Sheesh! You would think the person elected would serve as the King of England, wouldn't you? They will stop at nothing to win! It is at this point that Sam Weller tells Pickwick of his father's experience driving a coach down here. He was hired by one of the parties to bring down a coachload of voters from London, then bribed by the other party to make sure his coach tipped over at just the right time as to deposit all these voters in the canal. And that's exactly what happened! (Sam tells this story as if it is unbelievable that such an accident should have been foreseen by the man in advance... I'm thinking to myself, "Yeah, right!" That old guy, Sam's father had accepted their money and followed through by tipping the coach's occupants into the canal! lol)  These men believe their own election "contest excites great interest in the metropolis" of London! Pickwick confirms this. Of Mr. Pott, we learn,
All men whom mighty genius has raised to a proud eminence in the world, 
have usually some little weakness which appears the more conspicuous from the contrast 
it presents to their general character. If Mr. Pott had a weakness, it was, perhaps, 
that he was rather too submissive to the somewhat contemptuous control and sway of his wife. 
We do not feel justified in laying any particular stress upon the fact, because on the present  occasion all Mrs. Pott's winning ways were brought into requisition 
to receive the two gentleman. (163)
I laughed as I read this, because, of course, by mentioning this they are "laying...particular stress upon the fact"! :) Mr. Pickwick and Winkle are introduced as the house guests. (I was rather wondering at this juncture what had become of Weller, the new "man-servant.") I love the interplay of Mr. and Mrs. Pott. She will say to him, "P. my dear" and he will respond "My life." Too funny! 

Mr. Pott insists on sharing various "leaders" he had written for the Gazette for 1828, and Pickwick agrees that he "should like to hear them very much, indeed." Though they find no direct comments from Pickwick in his notebook later regarding these "leaders," Mr. Winkle had 
recorded the fact that his eyes were closed, as if with excess of pleasure, 
during the whole time of their perusal. (165)
Again, I am laughing! Definitely sounds as if Pickwick slept through the "perusal" of these "leaders" by Pott, doesn't it? :) Mrs. Pott confides to Mr. Winkle 
Mr. Pickwick was 'a delightful old dear.' These terms convey a familiarity of expression, 
in which few of those who were intimately acquainted with that colossal-minded man, 
would have presumed to indulge. We have preserved them, nevertheless, as affording at once a touching and a convincing proof of the estimation in which he was held by every class of society,
and the ease with which he made his way to their hearts and feelings. (165)
Okay, I admit, I am laughing and shaking my head, what an ego! ;) 

Mr. Snodgrass and Tupman are esconced at the Peacock and in the common room they are treated to "The Bagman's Story" as told them by a fellow traveler. "Tom Smart, of the great house of Bilson and Slum, Cateaton Street, City" was out on a "little neck-or-nothing sort of gig, with a clay-coloured body and red wheels," pulled by a "vixenish, ill-tempered, fast-going bay mare, that looked like a cross between a butcher's horse and a two-penny post-office pony" late one windy and very rainy night when he comes to a house for the night. Inside, of course (*wink wink*) is the widow who owns the house. The only thing wrong with this picture? This widow happens to have a suitor who has established himself in the house and is expected to marry the widow and thereby have the house for his own. Now, Tom, decides he wants this house, and the widow for his very own. It is during that night as he tries to sleep that the chair in his room comes to life, as an old man, and speaks to him, telling him the location of an unknown letter describing the suitor as a married man who had abandoned his family. Needless to say, the widow disowned the suitor, Tom tossed him out of the house a half hour later, and married the widow a month later. 
'Will you allow me to ask you," said the inquisitive old gentleman, 'what became of the chair.?'
'Why,' replied the one-eyed bagman, 'it was observed to creak very much on the day of the wedding; 
but Tom Smart couldn't say for certain whether it was with pleasure or bodily infirmity. 
He rather thought it was the latter, though, for it never spoke afterwards.' 
'Everybody believe the story, didn't they?' said the dirty-faced man, re-filling his pipe.
'Except Tom's enemies,' replied the bagman. 'Some of 'em said Tom invented it altogether; 
and others said he was drunk, and fancied it, and got hold of the wrong trousers 
by mistake before he went to bed. But nobody ever minded what they said.' 
'Tom said it was all true?' 
'Every word.'
'And your uncle?'
'Every letter.'
'They must have been very nice men, both of 'em,' said the dirty-faced man.
'Yes, they were,' replied the bagman; 'very nice men indeed!' (192)

So this installment ends with a parable.
I felt like Dickens was very sarcastic about how gullible people can be...
several times over during these three chapters!

More absurdity and enjoyment!!

I'm not sure I would enjoy this book as much if 
I was reading it straight through,
but it most certainly works for me reading 
the installments one month apart
just as it was released 180 years ago!
And I never tire of reading from my great bargain 
copy of The Oxford Illustrated Dickens edition
acquired for less then $5 from Half-Price Books
It is brand new, never been read before!
This one will definitely be a keeper for me, 
to remind me of this enjoyable read-along!

Happy Reading, Y'all!  

Top Ten Tuesday for August 2, 2016!!

This weekly meme 
is hosted by The Broke and the Bookish.
Of course, this is a wicked topic for someone like me 
who is trying NOT to purchase more books, 
but still it is tons of fun to imagine! 

This week's topic:

The Top Ten Books I'd Buy Right Now if 
Someone Gave Me a Fully-Loaded Gift Card

Of course, that card would need to work at my local indie bookstore!! 
(NOT Amazon...please!)

#1  I would buy the hardcover
      I have always secretly wanted this! 
      And yes, I am definitely 
      "a child at heart"!! Oh, and, of course,
      I would purchase one set for each of
      my three son's households, for the 
      grandkids!

      I have reread this whole 
      series 3 times!!
      and honestly, would love 
      to do so again...soon!





















#2  I would purchase all the books in Laurie R. King's 
      Russell & Holmes series! I own two, but would love to 
      own them all! My husband (who is retired) literally 
      'inhaled' this series after I introduced it to him! 
      I am slowly trying to work my way through it, but have 
      (as usual) over-committed myself to reading challenges, 
      Read-Alongs, etc.! :) I was introduced to this series     
      through the Christamore House Guild's 
     Book & Author Benefit this past spring. 
      What a delight to speak with Ms. King and 
      hear her talk about writing and her experiences! 

      I now own a personally inscribed copy of The Murder of Mary Russell, the most recent 
      release in this series! And although I rarely am enamored with a cover image, this one
      is absolutely gorgeous, in my opinion!

#3  I would love to own a 
gorgeously bound set of all 
Agatha Christie's books!
When my husband first established 
an E-Bay account I would drool 
over these and dream...
Christie represents my first foray
into "adult" mysteries.
For that reason, she, her books and characters will always hold a special place in my heart!

Try as I might, this was
the closest cover image
I could find to my own
gorgeous edition!
#4 I would love to purchase all the gorgeously bound 
oversized elegantly illustrated children's classics 
I could find for my grandchildren! 
There would need to be three of each title, 
one for each of my three son's households. 
I remember just such an edition of 
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass 
that someone gifted to me as a child. I loved that book so much!
The illustrations were gorgeous, some full page!
They were not the least cartoonish 
or especially spooky/scary. 
I would love to be able to provide such editions 
for all my grandchildren. 
They really are special!

#5 I would purchase whatever books my friends and fellow readers desired 
and gift them! 
I never will forget bringing signed copies of 
two of our favorite books to my 
book club members following a trip to 
Seattle where I met so many wonderful 
authors, including two of our 
Borders Book Club's favorites, 
I brought back gifts for each member, 
a signed copy of 
One member was especially thrilled, 
stating that she had never before owned a signed copy of any book!
That reminded me that what one person may consider common,  
may well be a brand-new delight to someone else!

#6 I cannot imagine a better feeling than to be able to stock 
each teacher's classroom library and each public school's library! 
If I'm gonna dream, I'm gonna dream big
How much fun would that be?!? 
As a former schoolteacher and librarian, it would definitely 
"put me over the top" for inspiration and fulfillment! 
And once I'm done in the U.S.? 
On to other countries! Why not?!? :)
Just imagining that makes my heart feel full and puts a huge smile on my face!
Wow...
<sigh>
Okay, back to my real life now! :)




 How about you?